Tapp into the Truth
Politics • News
Welcome to the Tapp into the Truth community. You don't have to be a listener or a fan of the show to be part of this community (but it helps). You just need to be a fan of personal liberty, a defender of the Constitution, and a lover of the republic that was founded as the United States of America.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Ninth Amendment

"The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

The Ninth Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights primarily as a compromise with the Federalists, who were opposed to having a Bill of Rights, believing that the federal government would, in times of overreach, ignore any right that the people have that is not explicitly listed. Not surprisingly, even with the Ninth Amendment in place, legal arguments have arisen regarding the legitimacy of rights that are not listed. But in modern times, the legal debates over the Ninth Amendment have not been precisely what the Federalists had expected.

The modern discussion is more of an "Originalist" vs. a "Progressive" debate over the Enumeration Clause. The view that the Ninth only serves to clarify that the enumeration of rights in the Constitution does not mean that only those listed rights are to be protected by the courts is a firm belief on one side; while others believe that the Ninth actually allows for the creation of "New Rights" as advancements are made in society. There are still others who argue somewhere in between, stating that the Ninth Amendment is an acknowledgment of "rights" that are not listed, but because they are not listed, the courts have no role or authority to act in their protection (which would certainly not permit the creation of "new" rights).

No matter which argument one might agree with, one thing is clear: the vagueness of this Amendment allows for things to get legally messy very easily. So much so that one of the biggest debates around the Ninth Amendment is whether it is even enforceable as written, and if it is enforceable, how to enforce it, and whether it should be enforced can often be a legitimate legal question. Those who believe it should be enforced frequently argue that the language implies the existence of unenumerated rights that are entitled to legal protection, just like those specifically listed in the Bill of Rights. Those who are opposed to its enforcement contend that the Ninth Amendment only acknowledges the existence of these rights without providing a way for courts to enforce them. They argue that it's a rule of construction, clarifying that the enumeration of some rights doesn't mean others are not protected, but it doesn't create any new legal rights. No matter where you find yourself falling on any of the debated points, the core of the debate remains whether the Ninth Amendment is a source of judicially enforceable rights or simply a statement about the limits of federal power and the existence of unenumerated rights of citizens.

Just like all of the Amendments in the Bill of Rights, the Ninth Amendment is intended to maintain the balance of power between the federal government and individual citizens, and to establish the role of the judiciary in protecting the rights of citizens as well as aid in interpreting the Constitution. In this case, however, the Framers faced an impossible task when writing the Ninth Amendment. The intent was to be vague enough to cover not only a wide range of rights that the people understood they had without listing them all, but also to encompass how those rights might be reinterpreted in a future where technologies and society itself changed. (And yes, this was an actual part of the debate as this Amendment was being written.) But, they still needed to be specific enough to remove questions about the role of the courts in protecting the rights of the citizens from government overreach (which, in this case, they clearly missed the mark. Not that anyone else could have done better without an actual list of protected rights, which would have missed the mark in the other direction.) Regardless of how effective the Amendment is, it has managed to elevate debate about inherent, God-given, constitutionally protected, individual rights. It keeps us working on how to define rights that are not listed, how those rights should be protected, and, most importantly, despite knowing that corruption would be inevitable, it keeps us focused on the knowledge that our government was built to protect citizens from abuses by an overreaching government; but the responsibility of keeping that government on that task belongs to We the People.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Why is There Antisemitism?

Clip from the Feb. 6th Tapp into the Truth Rumble Live Stream featuring Kenneth Abramowitz, author of The Multifront War: Defending America From Political Islam, China, Russia, Pandemics, and Racial Strife and founder of Save The West, a website dedicated to saving Western Civilization.

Watch the full video at:

00:01:00
placeholder
The Tenth Amendment

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Written in a time when it was understood by all that the states were to retain a high level of individual sovereignty from the federal (this is why the Senate was initially built to repersent the states and to protect states' rights at the federal level), the Tenth Amendment was intended to make clear that the Constitution was a limit on the powers of the federal government. It clearly states that the federal government only has the powers and authorities that are listed in the Articles of the Constitution. It literally states that anything not listed, any power not explicitly delegated to one of the three co-equal branches, is not within the power of the federal government to act upon.

The Tenth Amendment remains one of the most fiercely debated parts of the U.S. Constitution because it draws what many believe to be a clear line ...

Sig M18 Pistol Restrictions Expand To USAF Air Combat Command Units

“While Headquarters Air Combat Command has not directed a pause on the use of the M18 Modular Handgun System, some subordinate commanders have temporarily restricted use of the weapon out of an abundance of caution,” an ACC spokesperson said. “In those cases, it is feasible that alternative weapons could be substituted to accomplish the mission.”

https://www.twz.com/land/sig-m18-pistol-restrictions-expand-to-usaf-air-combat-command-units

Your AI May Be Ruthless; Liberty Is Only For A Moral People

A recent study uncovered disturbing AI blackmail behavior. When researchers put popular AI models in situations where their "survival" was threatened, the results were shocking. When backed into a corner, the tested AI systems didn't just roll over and accept their fate. Instead, they got creative. We're talking about blackmail attempts, corporate espionage, and in extreme test scenarios, even actions that could lead to someone's death. Marc Beckman, author of Some Future Day: How AI Is Going to Change Everything, joins me to discuss the study and better uses of AI.

Ron Edwards, host of The Ron Edwards American Experience, joins me to discuss illegal alien deportation flights out of "Alligator Alcatraz," Planned Parenthood closing five clinics in northern California after losing Medicaid funding thanks to President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," and more.

https://www.spreaker.com/episode/your-ai-may-be-ruthless-liberty-is-only-for-a-moral-people--67123057

March 18, 2025
post photo preview
Artificial Colors Banned by 2029

   Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. has issued a broad ban of “artificial colors by the end of his term in 2029 or face government intervention.”  While the new directive was focused toward the biggest companies in the food industry like PepsiCo North America, Kraft Heinz, General Mills, Tyson Foods, WK Kellogg, and JM Smucker (whom RFK, Jr. had meetings with the CEOs as well as representatives from the Consumer Brands Association), it is clear that all food manufactures and processors are expected to follow the edict.
   It is reported that RFK, Jr. told the executives that “removing artificial dyes is an urgent priority,” but he left what happens if the companies fail to comply intentionally vague. This ominous, open-ended threat was enough to make the markets react as stock for the food giants all dipped at a sharper rate than the S&P 500 in general (which was on a downward vector) pointing to investors’ concern about how the new directive will affect the bottom-line. (But to be fair, whenever the government gets involved to this extent, investors tend to get nervous, at least until they have a better idea of what the actual fallout will be.)
   How will the “removal of food dyes” policy affect the bottom line for food companies? Ultimately,, it is impossible to fully evaluate the question without knowing the ramificationsof non-compliance. After all, from a financial standpoint, it may be better to take the governmental penalty hit than a sales loss if the food is suddenly visually unappealing. People eat with their eyes, a,nd the U.S. market i,s not accustom,ed to seeing food that hasn’t been “dressed up” a bit to better meet an expected look. Add into the equation that there are surprisingly few “natural” food dyes that are as effective in coloring food items, and most are sourced in ways that are, shall we say, less than appetizing if you know the source. 
   This is a moment in time, however, where financial concerns may be overcome by both the true and the perceived health concerns that the dyes may present. The “Make America Healthy Again” movement has been picking up steam for years, well before it got its shiny new branding to fall inline with the Trump 2.0 administration. The American consumer has never been more conscious of what goes into their food and what the effects could be. This could put the food companies at more considerable risk of losses if the public believed that they were happy to risk your children’s health to pocket a little extra coin per unit sold. Especially given that companies like PepsiCo, Kraft Heinz, General Mills, WK Kellogg, and JM Smucker have different formulations, without many of the food dyes, that they have been selling in Europe for decades. 
   Further evidence of the moment we find ourselves in (regarding food colors and safety) is the fact that many states did not wait for the RFK, Jr. ultimatum to begin taking action. California has outlawed Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 1, and Green 3 in school meals. West Virginia is moving forward with bipartisan legislation that would ban a wide range of dyes and additives from all food products sold in the state. Removing harmful additives from our food supply seems to be one of the few truly bipartisan issues in our current political chaos.
  As impactful as removing food dyes from our diets will be, RFK Jr. has his sights set on a much bigger target, the GRAS system. That is the FDA’s “Generally Recognized As Safe” program that gives food manufacturers great latitude in using ingredients based on claims that an ingredient has been safe in other applications as scientific grounds to claim without the FDA officially, independently approving the ingredient for use in the manner the food company is intending. But that is a different topic for another day; just keep it on your radar.
   The question now isn’t, “does the American consumer want healthier options,” that has been made clear, and the answer is a resounding YES. The question is how those same consumers will react when they get what they are asking for. Will steak and ground beef sales hold steady when all the beef looks grey instead of red? Will they be as drawn to that banana pudding that is a natural off-white color instead of the yellow we all think of when we think banana? Well, we certainly can get used to these things if we have enough time. The US consumer, however, is notoriously impatient and very vocal during this kind of transition. So expect grumbling from the public and a bumpy ride for the food companies (in fact, some of the smaller companies may not survive to change. 
   Will MAHA succeed? It all depends on your definition of success, but time will tell.    

Read full Article
January 16, 2025
Losing At Chutes & Ladders

   I recently wrote about how Iran has effectively captured Venezuela as a proxy state in an article / op-ed that you can find at BizPac Review or here at locals. Iran has been "gifted" a large amount of land in Venezuela; It has entered into a 20-year "partnership agreement," and it has built (and is operating) a military drone factory at a Venezuelan military base, plus providing training on how to use the multiple attack UAVs that are being built there. While this is a reason to be concerned, things escalated a bit over the weekend and have been significantly downplayed by the legacy media to the point that next to no one is even talking about it.

   This past Saturday (January 11th, 2025), during Venezuela's "International Anti-Fascist Festival" in Caracas, the socialist dictator and Iranian lapdog Nicolás Maduro threatened to invade Puerto Rico, saying,  "Just as in the north they have a colonization agenda, we have a liberation agenda." and then adding, "The freedom of Puerto Rico is pending, and we will achieve it with Brazilian troops." No matter how serious you may take this threat - sabar rattling by someone looking to position himself in the eyes of the rest of South America, impress his Iranian, Russian, and Chinese "friends," just a big mouth who had a little too much to drink before taking the stage - whatever you may think, it s a clear, open threat against an American territory. (Kudos by the way to Jenniffer González-Colón, the current governor of Puerto Rico, who had the sense to skip reaching out to the (technically-still-in-charge) Biden/Haris White House and directly wrote Trump asking the in-coming administration to "to respond to the dictator's threat."

   Meanwhile, in Western Europe, China is looking to increase its influence in Germany. Chinese officials are working on a deal that would see Chinese automakers move into German automotive factories slated for closure and are particularly interested in Volkswagen's sites. Germany has previously been greatly dependent on Russia for energy (and reports vary as to the reality of how much that has actually changed since the Ukraine conflict), but taking the word of the German government about it, Germany can ill afford to trade that out the Russian influence for Chinese influence on what is (at least for now) the largest economy in the European Union.

   The pieces continue to be moved around the board by the Axis. And while the CCP and Iran lay the groundwork for what both believe will eventually end with them individually dominating the world, the Biden/Harris administration (either by incompetence or by design) continues to make it easier for what's left of the Free World to fall. January 20th, 2025, can't get here fast enough. Say what you will about Donald Trump, but at least he is not losing a game of Chutes & Ladders when the adversaries of the United States are playing 3-D chess.

Read full Article
January 14, 2025
post photo preview
Iran's Military Presence in Venezuela is Expanding
A New Proxy State Thanks To Joe Biden

   The Islamic Republic of Iran has been a disruptive force in the Middle East since the Islamic Revolution of 1979. Since the overthrow of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, a.k.a. the last Shah of Iran, Khomeini and his Mullahs set Iran on a course of destruction for both the modern Persian society that existed there at the time and their neighbors who did not subscribe to the Twelver Ja'afari Shia Islam imposed by Khomeini. This remains the path the theocratic Iranian regime follows today. Sunni Muslims, Christians, Jews, and anyone who exemplifies the concepts of Western Civilization remain a target of Iran or their proxies, either by open attack or terrorism.

   In recent years, Iran has decided to extend its influence beyond the Middle East, where it orchestrated attacks on Israel and Saudi Arabia and financed terror in Western Europe and piracy throughout the region. This expansion was born out of Russia's war with Ukraine. Russia found itself unable or unwilling to end the conflict quickly. Once the U.S. and most of Europe started sending "aid" and sanctioning Russia, Putin found himself in need of help from friends and frenemies alike. A new Axis (Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, and Venezuela) was formed as a result. An Axis that was, at least on the surface, allying with Russia against the U.S., NATO, and the Western World. Iran had been a long-standing ally of Russia, so it made sense that it would be part of this new Axis.

   A global financial partnership to end the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency, known as the BRIC nation bloc (named for its founding members: Brazil, Russia, India, and China) was formed in 2006, had its first summit in 2009, and South Africa joined the group in 2010 leading to an official name change to BRICS. However, this group of countries was largely unsuccessful and generally ignored by the world's financial powers as it was widely seen as a not-so-veiled effort by China to become the world's dominant economy. That changed in 2024 when China and Russia (two founding members) reached out to other nations that had issues with the various disastrous foreign policies enacted by the Biden/Haris administration, and a unified global financial force was born by expanding the group to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Iran (not to mention a long list of countries who have expressed interest in joining: Algeria, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Nigeria, Thailand, Turkey, Uganda, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam.) You will notice that some of these countries have been enemies for a very long time and, despite joining this group, remain adversarial, even hostile toward one another. Only the bungling of Joe Biden on the international stage brought some of these people together to work against the interests of the United States. So, "Let's Go Brandon!"

   It makes sense that Russia would want Iran to be a part of everything they are doing. As I pointed out before, they have been long-time allies due in large part to the amount of oil and lack of refining capacity in Iran. There are other reasons, but the sweetheart deal they worked out so long ago to refine oil for Iran made Russia an indispensable partner in the eyes of Mullahs and both sides rich. However, since the 1980s, there is another reason why Iran has become a valued ally of Russia. What most people don't know, despite the best efforts of people like myself who have been telling anyone who would listen for years now, is that Iran has been developing drone technology since the 1980s and is one of, if not the world leader in drone production (especially military drone production). Much of Russia's drone capabilities is a direct result of Iran.

   That takes us to the latest threat that Iran now poses. The other members of the Axis have developed an appreciation of the Iranian drone. So much so that Venezuela opened its borders to the Iranian proxy group Hezbollah, not only allowing them to operate within Venezuela but to actually "oversee" elections in some regions of the country since about 2017. Then, in 2022, Venezuela provided Iran with 1,000,000 hectares of "farmland for cultivation." Nicolás Maduro visited Tehran that year, where he signed a 20-year partnership agreement "on cooperation with Iran in various fields." It seems clear that what Iran has been "cultivating" is a new poxy state similar to Syria before the fall of the Bashar al-Assad regime, only this time, it's within striking distance of the United States. The IDF even warned everyone in March of 2024 that Iran was arming Venezuela with weapons that were "very capable of hitting the U.S."

   Maria Villarroel, writing for the Latin Times, revealed in her January 11, 2025, article that Iran had built a drone development factory and was training Venezuelan military personnel at the El Libertador air base in Venezuela. One of the wide range of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) being produced there is the ZAMORA V-1, used for one-way attack missions. (And by the way, Iran has indicated that it intends to sell UAVs to other countries in the region, a practice that could - and most likely will - destabilize the geopolitical landscape in Latin America.)

   Iran developed its drone technology and is still developing its nuclear capabilities, making it extremely dangerous to Israel, all the Sunni Muslims, Christians, and anyone who does not share their belief in the Twelver Ja'afari Shia tradition within its reach. Iran has strengthened the so-called Red-Green Axis, as it serves its purpose of advancing their belief in the eventual worldwide caliphate. And Iran has harnessed Venezuela as a proxy under the ruthless and illegitimate rule of Nicolás Maduro. All of this happened under the watch of Joe Biden, who, instead of working to prevent it, actually helped Iran to pay for it all. That includes an additional 10 billion dollars in sanctions relief issued three days after the 2024 Presidential election. So, thanks Joe, and one more time on your way out the door, "Let's Go Brandon!"

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals