Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. has issued a broad ban of “artificial colors by the end of his term in 2029 or face government intervention.” While the new directive was focused toward the biggest companies in the food industry like PepsiCo North America, Kraft Heinz, General Mills, Tyson Foods, WK Kellogg, and JM Smucker (whom RFK, Jr. had meetings with the CEOs as well as representatives from the Consumer Brands Association), it is clear that all food manufactures and processors are expected to follow the edict.
It is reported that RFK, Jr. told the executives that “removing artificial dyes is an urgent priority,” but he left what happens if the companies fail to comply intentionally vague. This ominous, open-ended threat was enough to make the markets react as stock for the food giants all dipped at a sharper rate than the S&P 500 in general (which was on a downward vector) pointing to investors’ concern about how the new directive will affect the bottom-line. (But to be fair, whenever the government gets involved to this extent, investors tend to get nervous, at least until they have a better idea of what the actual fallout will be.)
How will the “removal of food dyes” policy affect the bottom line for food companies? Ultimately,, it is impossible to fully evaluate the question without knowing the ramificationsof non-compliance. After all, from a financial standpoint, it may be better to take the governmental penalty hit than a sales loss if the food is suddenly visually unappealing. People eat with their eyes, a,nd the U.S. market i,s not accustom,ed to seeing food that hasn’t been “dressed up” a bit to better meet an expected look. Add into the equation that there are surprisingly few “natural” food dyes that are as effective in coloring food items, and most are sourced in ways that are, shall we say, less than appetizing if you know the source.
This is a moment in time, however, where financial concerns may be overcome by both the true and the perceived health concerns that the dyes may present. The “Make America Healthy Again” movement has been picking up steam for years, well before it got its shiny new branding to fall inline with the Trump 2.0 administration. The American consumer has never been more conscious of what goes into their food and what the effects could be. This could put the food companies at more considerable risk of losses if the public believed that they were happy to risk your children’s health to pocket a little extra coin per unit sold. Especially given that companies like PepsiCo, Kraft Heinz, General Mills, WK Kellogg, and JM Smucker have different formulations, without many of the food dyes, that they have been selling in Europe for decades.
Further evidence of the moment we find ourselves in (regarding food colors and safety) is the fact that many states did not wait for the RFK, Jr. ultimatum to begin taking action. California has outlawed Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 1, and Green 3 in school meals. West Virginia is moving forward with bipartisan legislation that would ban a wide range of dyes and additives from all food products sold in the state. Removing harmful additives from our food supply seems to be one of the few truly bipartisan issues in our current political chaos.
As impactful as removing food dyes from our diets will be, RFK Jr. has his sights set on a much bigger target, the GRAS system. That is the FDA’s “Generally Recognized As Safe” program that gives food manufacturers great latitude in using ingredients based on claims that an ingredient has been safe in other applications as scientific grounds to claim without the FDA officially, independently approving the ingredient for use in the manner the food company is intending. But that is a different topic for another day; just keep it on your radar.
The question now isn’t, “does the American consumer want healthier options,” that has been made clear, and the answer is a resounding YES. The question is how those same consumers will react when they get what they are asking for. Will steak and ground beef sales hold steady when all the beef looks grey instead of red? Will they be as drawn to that banana pudding that is a natural off-white color instead of the yellow we all think of when we think banana? Well, we certainly can get used to these things if we have enough time. The US consumer, however, is notoriously impatient and very vocal during this kind of transition. So expect grumbling from the public and a bumpy ride for the food companies (in fact, some of the smaller companies may not survive to change.
Will MAHA succeed? It all depends on your definition of success, but time will tell.
Tapp into the Truth
Welcome to the Tapp into the Truth community. You don't have to be a listener or a fan of the show to be part of this community (but it helps). You just need to be a fan of personal liberty, a defender of the Constitution, and a lover of the republic that was founded as the United States of America.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Tim_Tapp@Tim_Tapp
July 23, 2025
The Sixth Amendment
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed; which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense."
The Sixth Amendment is focused on protecting the rights of citizens accused of a crime. It guarantees important rights to criminal defendants, and while there is a long-standing sentiment that our system works harder to protect criminals than victims, it is vital to remember that to be accused is not the same as being guilty. Suppose the day should ever arise that you find yourself wrongfully accused of a crime. In that case, you will be glad to be in a system that puts the "burden of proof" on the accusers rather than the reverse.
Right to a Speedy Trial: The "right to a speedy and public trial" is rarely an issue, as attorneys for both the prosecution and the defense typically welcome "reasonable" delays to build their case and/or defense. However, such delays are not the reason behind this restriction placed on the government. A "speedy trial" is intended to prevent the government from taking someone into custody and then detaining them for an extended period without affording them the opportunity to defend themselves against the accusations made against them. It is intended to prevent the taking of "political prisoners" in the United States. (That is also the reasoning behind making these trails "public." )
Right to an Impartial Jury: The idea of the jury trial is that a group of peers will see the evidence that the government has brought against the accused and determine the guilt and/or "not guilt" of the accused based solely on the case presented. (A jury will not determine the innocence of the accused, as the working premise is that the accused is innocent until proven guilty. The jury is only determining if the government's case is sufficient for a finding of guilt based on the legal standards, which are not the same for all crimes.) In order for this to work as intended, the jury must be impartial towards the accused, the crime they are accused of, and the government seeking the conviction of the accused. A biased jury is unlikely to decide the case based solely on the evidence presented, rendering the entire purpose of a jury trial moot. But through an impartial jury, the system is more likely to protect the rights of the accused.
The Right to Know Why and What: In our modern world, here in the U.S., it is hard to imagine someone being taken into custody without being told why. The right to know what you are being accused of is fundamental to your ability to defend yourself. A quick look around the world (at the time of the Framing and even today in many places) reveals the importance of this aspect of the Sixth Amendment.
The Right to Face Your Accusers & Present Defense Witnesses: Many believe that the right for the accuser to be able to look witnesses against them in the eye at the time of testimony is based on the rather old-fashioned notion that it is harder to lie about someone when you are doing it in front of them. It is possible to argue that many people will not speak as freely about someone if that someone is in the room and you know they are hearing everything you are saying. However, it is just as likely that a witness may be less inclined to tell the truth out of fear of the accused, as they would be less likely to lie about the accused due to the prospect of facing them. The Framers knew this, but included it nonetheless, as they believed a person has a right to know who is bearing witness against them, and they understood that this would allow the accused to offer the best defense possible, which is the individual right they were trying to protect.
The ability to offer witnesses of your own is a natural extension of the "best possible defense" ideology. It is often said that you could "get an indictment against a ham sandwich" from a Grand Jury. This is because, at the Grand Jury stage of the criminal justice process, jurors are only presented with evidence and testimony from the government's side of the case. (The idea being to test the strength of the government's case and if a trial is warranted.) If the accused were not allowed to present witnesses in their defense, the trial would not be much different from the Grand Jury hearing, a very one-sided prosecution without any defense. Additionally, the ability to cross-examine witnesses against the accused is at the heart of this right. It is through cross-examination that the government's "best witnesses" can often be shown to be less than stellar witnesses in the full light, as opposed to the government-centered testimony first given.
The Right to Counsel: The right of the accused to have an attorney represent them, even if they cannot afford one, is vital to ensuring the best possible defense. Challenging the case presented by the government on a legal basis is a task best left to a competent lawyer whose primary concern in the case is to provide the accused with the best possible defense. This does lead to many questions about the adequacy of public defenders when they are pressed into service for "those who cannot afford an attorney." The concern being about the quality and availability of legal representation due to the various public defender systems often being underfunded and overburdened, which can certainly lead to inadequate investigations, limited time with clients, and insufficient preparation for trials. That would be a violation of the spirit if not the letter of the Sixth Amendment.
Many factors can make it challenging to protect the rights of accused citizens, as listed in the Sixth Amendment. Determining the difference between reasonable delays in moving forward with a trial and delays that are meant to stall for the government to strengthen their case or just keep the accused detained pretrial; ensuring the impartiality of a jury, making the process of jury selection challenging regarding potential biases or undue influence from factors like pretrial publicity; and the adequacy/effectiveness of counsel are all moving parts that require a delicate balance. However, that is a balance that is necessary to protect an accused citizen's right to a fair trial.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Why is There Antisemitism?
Clip from the Feb. 6th Tapp into the Truth Rumble Live Stream featuring Kenneth Abramowitz, author of The Multifront War: Defending America From Political Islam, China, Russia, Pandemics, and Racial Strife and founder of Save The West, a website dedicated to saving Western Civilization.
Watch the full video at:
00:01:00
The Seventh Amendment
"In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."
The Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right to a jury trial in civil cases where the legal remedy sought is more than twenty dollars (which, I will point out, was a lot more valuable at the time of the Framing than it is today). However, its application and interpretation have been the subject of ongoing debate and controversy, particularly in recent times. Surprisingly, very little of the debate has focused on the Amendment itself, but rather on the scope of its application. (Although, much like the other Amendments making up the Bill of Rights, we do have an ongoing debate about the meaning of one of its linchpins, the definition of "common law" for civil suits.
Perhaps the most crucial legal...
States Suing The Trump Administration to Keep Benefits Flowing to Illegal Aliens?
For your information, here is the current list (as of July 23, 2025) of states that are suing the Trump administration, fighting to keep benefits flowing to illegal aliens.
California
Colorado
Nevada
Arizona
Connecticut
Hawaii
Illinois
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Nevada
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
Oregon
Rhode Island
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
And don't forget the non-state, the District of Columbia.
Earth Will Spin Faster Today to Create 2nd-Shortest Day in History
"Earth will complete a full rotation in slightly less time than usual today (July 22), making it one of the shortest days ever recorded.
The difference will be just 1.34 milliseconds less than the standard 24 hours — not something you'll notice — but it's part of a puzzling trend in Earth's rotational behavior that has been unfolding in recent years. If it continues, a second may need to be subtracted from atomic clocks around 2029 — a so-called negative leap second, which has never been done before." - Jamie Carter
Artificial Colors Banned by 2029
Losing At Chutes & Ladders
I recently wrote about how Iran has effectively captured Venezuela as a proxy state in an article / op-ed that you can find at BizPac Review or here at locals. Iran has been "gifted" a large amount of land in Venezuela; It has entered into a 20-year "partnership agreement," and it has built (and is operating) a military drone factory at a Venezuelan military base, plus providing training on how to use the multiple attack UAVs that are being built there. While this is a reason to be concerned, things escalated a bit over the weekend and have been significantly downplayed by the legacy media to the point that next to no one is even talking about it.
This past Saturday (January 11th, 2025), during Venezuela's "International Anti-Fascist Festival" in Caracas, the socialist dictator and Iranian lapdog Nicolás Maduro threatened to invade Puerto Rico, saying, "Just as in the north they have a colonization agenda, we have a liberation agenda." and then adding, "The freedom of Puerto Rico is pending, and we will achieve it with Brazilian troops." No matter how serious you may take this threat - sabar rattling by someone looking to position himself in the eyes of the rest of South America, impress his Iranian, Russian, and Chinese "friends," just a big mouth who had a little too much to drink before taking the stage - whatever you may think, it s a clear, open threat against an American territory. (Kudos by the way to Jenniffer González-Colón, the current governor of Puerto Rico, who had the sense to skip reaching out to the (technically-still-in-charge) Biden/Haris White House and directly wrote Trump asking the in-coming administration to "to respond to the dictator's threat."
Meanwhile, in Western Europe, China is looking to increase its influence in Germany. Chinese officials are working on a deal that would see Chinese automakers move into German automotive factories slated for closure and are particularly interested in Volkswagen's sites. Germany has previously been greatly dependent on Russia for energy (and reports vary as to the reality of how much that has actually changed since the Ukraine conflict), but taking the word of the German government about it, Germany can ill afford to trade that out the Russian influence for Chinese influence on what is (at least for now) the largest economy in the European Union.
The pieces continue to be moved around the board by the Axis. And while the CCP and Iran lay the groundwork for what both believe will eventually end with them individually dominating the world, the Biden/Harris administration (either by incompetence or by design) continues to make it easier for what's left of the Free World to fall. January 20th, 2025, can't get here fast enough. Say what you will about Donald Trump, but at least he is not losing a game of Chutes & Ladders when the adversaries of the United States are playing 3-D chess.
Iran's Military Presence in Venezuela is Expanding
A New Proxy State Thanks To Joe Biden
The Islamic Republic of Iran has been a disruptive force in the Middle East since the Islamic Revolution of 1979. Since the overthrow of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, a.k.a. the last Shah of Iran, Khomeini and his Mullahs set Iran on a course of destruction for both the modern Persian society that existed there at the time and their neighbors who did not subscribe to the Twelver Ja'afari Shia Islam imposed by Khomeini. This remains the path the theocratic Iranian regime follows today. Sunni Muslims, Christians, Jews, and anyone who exemplifies the concepts of Western Civilization remain a target of Iran or their proxies, either by open attack or terrorism.
In recent years, Iran has decided to extend its influence beyond the Middle East, where it orchestrated attacks on Israel and Saudi Arabia and financed terror in Western Europe and piracy throughout the region. This expansion was born out of Russia's war with Ukraine. Russia found itself unable or unwilling to end the conflict quickly. Once the U.S. and most of Europe started sending "aid" and sanctioning Russia, Putin found himself in need of help from friends and frenemies alike. A new Axis (Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, and Venezuela) was formed as a result. An Axis that was, at least on the surface, allying with Russia against the U.S., NATO, and the Western World. Iran had been a long-standing ally of Russia, so it made sense that it would be part of this new Axis.
A global financial partnership to end the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency, known as the BRIC nation bloc (named for its founding members: Brazil, Russia, India, and China) was formed in 2006, had its first summit in 2009, and South Africa joined the group in 2010 leading to an official name change to BRICS. However, this group of countries was largely unsuccessful and generally ignored by the world's financial powers as it was widely seen as a not-so-veiled effort by China to become the world's dominant economy. That changed in 2024 when China and Russia (two founding members) reached out to other nations that had issues with the various disastrous foreign policies enacted by the Biden/Haris administration, and a unified global financial force was born by expanding the group to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Iran (not to mention a long list of countries who have expressed interest in joining: Algeria, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Nigeria, Thailand, Turkey, Uganda, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam.) You will notice that some of these countries have been enemies for a very long time and, despite joining this group, remain adversarial, even hostile toward one another. Only the bungling of Joe Biden on the international stage brought some of these people together to work against the interests of the United States. So, "Let's Go Brandon!"
It makes sense that Russia would want Iran to be a part of everything they are doing. As I pointed out before, they have been long-time allies due in large part to the amount of oil and lack of refining capacity in Iran. There are other reasons, but the sweetheart deal they worked out so long ago to refine oil for Iran made Russia an indispensable partner in the eyes of Mullahs and both sides rich. However, since the 1980s, there is another reason why Iran has become a valued ally of Russia. What most people don't know, despite the best efforts of people like myself who have been telling anyone who would listen for years now, is that Iran has been developing drone technology since the 1980s and is one of, if not the world leader in drone production (especially military drone production). Much of Russia's drone capabilities is a direct result of Iran.
That takes us to the latest threat that Iran now poses. The other members of the Axis have developed an appreciation of the Iranian drone. So much so that Venezuela opened its borders to the Iranian proxy group Hezbollah, not only allowing them to operate within Venezuela but to actually "oversee" elections in some regions of the country since about 2017. Then, in 2022, Venezuela provided Iran with 1,000,000 hectares of "farmland for cultivation." Nicolás Maduro visited Tehran that year, where he signed a 20-year partnership agreement "on cooperation with Iran in various fields." It seems clear that what Iran has been "cultivating" is a new poxy state similar to Syria before the fall of the Bashar al-Assad regime, only this time, it's within striking distance of the United States. The IDF even warned everyone in March of 2024 that Iran was arming Venezuela with weapons that were "very capable of hitting the U.S."
Maria Villarroel, writing for the Latin Times, revealed in her January 11, 2025, article that Iran had built a drone development factory and was training Venezuelan military personnel at the El Libertador air base in Venezuela. One of the wide range of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) being produced there is the ZAMORA V-1, used for one-way attack missions. (And by the way, Iran has indicated that it intends to sell UAVs to other countries in the region, a practice that could - and most likely will - destabilize the geopolitical landscape in Latin America.)
Iran developed its drone technology and is still developing its nuclear capabilities, making it extremely dangerous to Israel, all the Sunni Muslims, Christians, and anyone who does not share their belief in the Twelver Ja'afari Shia tradition within its reach. Iran has strengthened the so-called Red-Green Axis, as it serves its purpose of advancing their belief in the eventual worldwide caliphate. And Iran has harnessed Venezuela as a proxy under the ruthless and illegitimate rule of Nicolás Maduro. All of this happened under the watch of Joe Biden, who, instead of working to prevent it, actually helped Iran to pay for it all. That includes an additional 10 billion dollars in sanctions relief issued three days after the 2024 Presidential election. So, thanks Joe, and one more time on your way out the door, "Let's Go Brandon!"
