I first wrote this on Aug. 18, 2018, but the website that first published it is no longer operating. An early draft can still be found on tappintothetruth.com on the blog page of the site.
I am guessing that by now, you have heard about the young American couple who had decided to take a year-long bike trip around the world. Jay Austin was a vegan who worked for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and Lauren Geoghegan was a vegetarian who worked in the Georgetown University admissions office. Both were 29 years old, and they decided to quit their jobs last year to make their trip.
I think it would be fair to say that these two young idealists lived in a bubble. They had convinced themselves that evil was a “make-believe concept.” Austin, in his personal journal, wrote, “I’ve grown tired of spending the best hours of my day in front of a glowing rectangle, of coloring the best years of my life in swaths of grey and beige. I’ve missed too many sunsets while my back was turned. Too many thunderstorms went unwatched, too many gentle breezes unnoticed.” A romantic notion, one that a lot of people can admire his willingness to follow through on. But the refusal to believe that there are bad people out in the world who will do bad things to you without the need for you to provoke them was a tragically naïve belief that cost him and Lauren Geoghegan their lives.
Their trip went on for 369 days, taking them from the southernmost tip of Africa in Capetown, South Africa, to Namibia, Botswana, Zambia, Malawi, Tanzania, Egypt, Morocco, Spain, France, Italy, Croatia, Montenegro, Kosovo, Turkey, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and finally Tajikistan, where their journey ended when they were murdered along with two other cyclists, one from Switzerland and the other from the Netherlands. Five men exited a car and stabbed the bicyclists to death. ISIS claimed responsibility in print and followed up with a video showing the five attackers pledging allegiance to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
I am also guessing that by now, you have heard about the Jihadi training camp in New Mexico, where children were being trained to carry out school shootings. There are a lot of disturbing details that are still emerging from this news story. Details like the fact that the children in the compound were armed and ready to engage law enforcement until one of the adults told them to stand down. Details like a deceased 3-year-old disabled boy found at the compound died from being denied his medication and lost his life during an Islamic prayer session to expel the demons they believed were inside him. Details like one of the children saying that they believed the deceased boy would resurrect in about four months and inform the compound residents of their specific targets. That child mentioned law enforcement personnel, educational institutions, financial institutions, and banks as potential targets.
As shocking as it was for some to discover that a camp like this was operating in the United States (it was no surprise at all for others that have been warning of such compounds for years), as shocking as the many details that continue to surface about the people who were involved and what they were doing there, there was nothing that could have prepared any of us for what happened when the people running this compound got in front of Judge Sarah Backus. Judge Backus released four of the five adults to house arrest and on a $20,000 "signature bond," which means they just have to sign a document promising to return to court when it is time for trial. If they do not show up to court, they will face arrest and be required to pay $20,000 as a penalty. Judge Backus also ruled they must reside in “acceptable” living conditions, wear ankle monitors, cannot have firearms, cannot leave the country, and can only see their children during supervised visits.
How did the judge come to this ruling? Well, the defense attorney for the arrested extremists claimed they were the victims of discrimination because they are Muslims and black. The defense argued that there was no strong evidence of a specific terrorist plot, only aspirations. And the judge agreed that not having a specific plan somehow makes them less dangerous. Backus also made mention of the fact that four of the five had no criminal record (the fifth was a fugitive with an outstanding warrant in Georgia). The guns at the compound were acquired legally, and even though the children stood ready, they did not resist law enforcement. (I would argue at this point that none of that accounts for the child abuse and the death of the three-year-old, but that’s just me.)
Judge Sarah Backus is a San Francisco transplant to New Mexico. She has a history of issuing low bail to violent offenders. This has led many to speculate that she was motivated more by a social justice activist mindset than from upholding her oath to render justice and protect the public. Given the evidence that was presented and the testimony of law enforcement at the hearing, one could be forgiven for letting the thought cross your mind that she was indeed acting as an SJW rather than an officer of the court. It certainly appears as if the rules of Political Correctness trumped the law.
There is evil in the world. There are people prepared to carry out acts of evil. Jay Austin and Lauren Geoghegan didn’t deserve to be murdered. Members of ISIS committed this act of evil and then bragged about it. The people living at the compound in New Mexico shared a belief that many ISIS members would call an “extremist cult.” Those people are now (house arrest or not) out of custody and free to commit an act of violence should their “true target” be revealed, with little chance of stopping it until it’s too late. I am left pondering; which is more evil, the attacks the jihadist in New Mexico were training to carry out or the release of clearly dangerous people in the name of Political Correctness? I just pray that no innocent person pays a price for this judge’s lapse in judgment.